Paper Instructions
Academic level – Graduate
Type of paper – Research paper
Topic Title – Assistive technology in education
Instructions:
Research two low-tech, two high-tech, two augmentative, and two alternative assistive technology devices appropriate for students with previously identified mild to moderate language disabilities.
Research Paper Sample
Low Tech Assistive Technology
- Communication Boards
Potential Uses – Communication boards enable limited language individuals to convey needs, preferences, and choices via visual symbols (Stanborough, 2020).
Advantages – It is simple and intuitive, fosters basic communication skills, and is adaptable to individual preferences.
Disadvantages – Limited vocabulary and expression may not suit complex communication needs.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Mild to moderate language disabilities.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Inclusion, resource, self-contained.
- Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS)
Potential Uses –
Advantages –
Disadvantages –
Application for Which Disorder(s) –
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) –
- High Tech Assistive Technology
- Speech-Generating Devices (SGDs)
Potential Uses – Speech-generating devices aid students with communication challenges (Editorial Team, 2021).
Advantages – The rich vocabulary and expressive communication support individuals with limited verbal abilities.
Disadvantages – Costly, technical upkeep, learning curve.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Mild to moderate language disabilities.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Inclusion, resource, self-contained.
- Tablet Apps for Communication
Potential Uses – Customizable boards, text-to-speech, interactive.
Advantages – Portable, interactive, adaptable to user preferences, and integrates multiple modalities.
Disadvantages – Limited screen, tech reliance.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Mild to moderate language disabilities.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Inclusion, resource, self-contained.
- Augmentative Assistive Technology
- Eye-Tracking Communication Systems
Potential Uses – Enable communication via eye movements for students with mild to moderate language disabilities and motor limitations.
Advantages – It offers communication for individuals with severe motor impairments, can be used to control devices, and provides an alternative channel for expression.
Disadvantages – Facilitates communication for severe motor impairments, usable for device control.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Mild to moderate language disabilities and motor control issues.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Effective for inclusion and resource settings.
- Gesture-Based Communication Apps
Potential Uses – Allows communication via gestures for students with mild to moderate language disabilities and motor difficulties.
Advantages – Appealing and interactive, it suits students with motor difficulties and promotes physical engagement.
Disadvantages – Limited gestures, potential misinterpretation.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Mild to moderate language disabilities and motor difficulties.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Enhances inclusion and resource settings.
- Alternative Assistive Technology
- Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)
Potential Uses – Enhances inclusion and resource settings.
Advantages – Provides communication for those with limited motor control and potential for advanced control beyond communication.
Disadvantages – Complex, costly, technical obstacles.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Severe language disabilities and motor impairments.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Specialized usage due to complexity.
- Text-to-Speech Software with Gaze Control
Potential Uses – Allows eye movement and text-to-speech communication for severe language disabilities and motor impairments.
Advantages – It enables effective communication and information access and suits students with limited motor control.
Disadvantages – Requires training, calibration, and tech dependency.
Application for Which Disorder(s) – Severe language disabilities and motor impairments.
Application in the Classroom (Inclusion, Resource, Self-Contained, or mix?) – Enhances specialized settings with support.
References
Editorial Team. (2021, June 28). Top speech generating devices (sgds) parents must know about. EdTechReview. https://www.edtechreview.in/trends-insights/trends/top-speech-generating-devices-sgds-parents-must-know-about/
Kruger, J. (2022, June). The effectiveness of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) on reducing problem behaviors in students with autism spectrum disorder. The Repository at St. Cloud State. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/sped_etds/131
Stanborough, R. J. (2020, July 20). What is a communication board and how does it help?. Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/communication-board#bottom-line